Thursday, February 24, 2011

James Ference - Not a "Maiden" of virtue

A reader of the blog sent this to me.

Could this be wife number 1?  Or just another in a long line of James Ference wives?

Application Date: 11/12/1998Ceremony Date: License No: 98MR02724

First NameMid NameLast NameSufBirthplace
GroomJAMESDAVIDFERENCE
ARIZONA
BrideTERRISUEHUNTER
KANSAS

From Johnson County, Kansas public records. 
SOURCE
(then search for last name 'Ference' and select 'Marriage License')


And, the divorce...

Case NoDivisionLast NameFirst NameMiddle NameROLECAPTION
01CV028319FERENCEJAMESDAVIDDEFHUNTER vs. HUNTER ET AL

Also from Johnson County, Kansas public records. 
SOURCE
(search for last name 'Ference' and select 'Civil'
 

Interesting to note that James' last name was Ference when they married.  He then changed HIS last name to 'Hunter'.  (Notice how the case is "Hunter vs. Hunter"?)  If you look at the details of the divorce, a notation was made of a maiden name restoration.  James being the "maiden".  He got his name restored back to Ference.   How strange is that?

10/04/2001Defendant FERENCE, JAMES DAVID added on 10/04/01
10/04/2001FILE STAMP 09/28/01, FILM DATE 09/28/01 MICR # 336, DECREE OF DIVORCE(MAIDEN NAME RESTORED)...SEPARATION OF AGREEMENT

4 comments:

Krista555 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Krista555 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Administrator said...

The plot thickens. Research time...

Beatrice said...

Looks like Natalie has filed for a separation. And child support. And custody.
http://www.cookcountyclerkofcourt.org