Could this be wife number 1? Or just another in a long line of James Ference wives?
Application Date: 11/12/1998 | Ceremony Date: | License No: 98MR02724 |
---|
First Name | Mid Name | Last Name | Suf | Birthplace | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groom | JAMES | DAVID | FERENCE | ARIZONA | |
Bride | TERRI | SUE | HUNTER | KANSAS |
From Johnson County, Kansas public records.
SOURCE
(then search for last name 'Ference' and select 'Marriage License')
And, the divorce...
Case No | Division | Last Name | First Name | Middle Name | ROLE | CAPTION |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01CV02831 | 9 | FERENCE | JAMES | DAVID | DEF | HUNTER vs. HUNTER ET AL |
Also from Johnson County, Kansas public records.
SOURCE
(search for last name 'Ference' and select 'Civil'
Interesting to note that James' last name was Ference when they married. He then changed HIS last name to 'Hunter'. (Notice how the case is "Hunter vs. Hunter"?) If you look at the details of the divorce, a notation was made of a maiden name restoration. James being the "maiden". He got his name restored back to Ference. How strange is that?
10/04/2001 | Defendant FERENCE, JAMES DAVID added on 10/04/01 |
10/04/2001 | FILE STAMP 09/28/01, FILM DATE 09/28/01 MICR # 336, DECREE OF DIVORCE(MAIDEN NAME RESTORED)...SEPARATION OF AGREEMENT |
4 comments:
The plot thickens. Research time...
Looks like Natalie has filed for a separation. And child support. And custody.
http://www.cookcountyclerkofcourt.org
Post a Comment